"Man is condemned to be free; because once thrown into the world, he is
responsible for everything he does."
Jean-Paul Sartre, French philosopher, playwrigtht, novelist, essayist, political activist and literary critic (1905-1980) He refused the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1964.
I do believe this quote needs some contextualisation, especially to put the use of "condemned" into perspective. Here is the passage (first in French, English following right after):
"Dostoïevski avait écrit : " Si Dieu n'existait pas, tout serait permis
". C'est là le point de départ de l'existentialisme. En effet, tout est
permis si Dieu n'existe pas, et par conséquent l'homme est délaissé,
parce qu'il ne trouve ni en lui, ni hors de lui une possibilité de
s'accrocher. Il ne trouve d'abord pas d'excuses. Si, en effet,
l'existence précède l'essence, on ne pourra jamais expliquer par
référence à une nature humaine donnée et figée ; autrement dit, il n'y a
pas de déterminisme, l'homme est libre, l'homme est liberté. Si,
d'autre part, Dieu n'existe pas, nous ne trouvons pas en face de nous
des valeurs ou des ordres qui légitimeront notre conduite. Ainsi, nous
n'avons ni derrière nous, ni devant nous, dans le domaine lumineux des
valeurs, des justifications ou des excuses. Nous sommes seuls, sans
excuses. C'est ce que j'exprimerai en disant que l'homme est condamné à
être libre. Condamné, parce qu'il ne s'est pas créé lui-même, et par
ailleurs cependant libre, parce qu'une fois jeté dans le monde il est
responsable de tout ce qu'il fait. L'existentialiste ne croit pas à la
puissance de la passion. Il ne pensera jamais qu'une belle passion est
un torrent dévastateur qui conduit fatalement l'homme à certains actes,
et qui, par conséquent, est une excuse. Il pense que l'homme est
responsable de sa passion. L'existentialiste ne pensera pas non plus que
l'homme peut trouver un secours dans un signe donné, sur terre, qui
l'orientera ; car il pense que l'homme déchiffre lui- même le signe
comme il lui plaît. Il pense donc que l'homme, sans aucun appui et sans
aucun secours, est condamné à chaque instant à inventer l'homme." L'existentialisme est un humanisme, 1946.
"Dostoevsky once wrote "If God did not exist, everything would be permitted”; and that, for existentialism, is the starting point. Everything is indeed permitted if God does not exist, and man is in consequence forlorn, for he cannot find anything to depend upon either within or outside himself. He discovers forthwith, that he is without excuse. For if indeed existence precedes essence, one will never be able to explain one’s action by reference to a given and specific human nature; in other words, there is no determinism — man is free, man is freedom. Nor, on the other hand, if God does not exist, are we provided with any values or commands that could legitimise our behaviour. Thus we have neither behind us, nor before us in a luminous realm of values, any means of justification or excuse. — We are left alone, without excuse. That is what I mean when I say that man is condemned to be free. Condemned, because he did not create himself, yet is nevertheless at liberty, and from the moment that he is thrown into this world he is responsible for everything he does. The existentialist does not believe in the power of passion. He will never regard a grand passion as a destructive torrent upon which a man is swept into certain actions as by fate, and which, therefore, is an excuse for them. He thinks that man is responsible for his passion. Neither will an existentialist think that a man can find help through some sign being vouchsafed upon earth for his orientation: for he thinks that the man himself interprets the sign as he chooses. He thinks that every man, without any support or help whatsoever, is condemned at every instant to invent man." Existentialism is a Humanism, 1946.
I think the notion underlined in the quote I initially posted (and highlighted with Dostoevsky's The Brothers Karamazov quote in which Ivan Karamazov claims that "if God does not exist, then everything is permitted") is that of accountability. We alone are responsible for our actions. We cannot make excuses other than that which we can connect directly to our thoughts, beliefs, values, actions. Condemned we are because we haven't made a conscious decision to be here on Earth, but as we do indeed live on it now we do have the freedome, the luxury, the luck, the moral obligation -- whatever you want to call it, and there's many more phrases which could be added -- to choose with our own conscience to vouch for our actions.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Avis sur la chose en question
Feedback on the thing in question